It is reassuring to see Conservatives in power who want to cut taxes. For too long, the party has wedded itself to the tax-and-spend shibboleths of the left, believing that it is government’s role to merely hoover up as much money as possible and then to spaff it around with vigour.
In its years-long attempt to out-left-the-left, the supposedly free-market party all but forgot that it is the productivity and energy of the private sector that gives the nation the resources it needs to function properly. Their forgotten creed is, put simply: make the economic pie bigger, and even if the state’s slice is proportionally smaller, government coffers will overfloweth with more cash.
Don’t believe it? Ask yourself which would bring in more: a 90% income tax in Eritrea or a 15% income tax in Switzerland? If you chose the former, then it’s back to school with you.
Once such free-market axioms guided the party. However, for too long it has dumbed down its commitment, seeking to evade accusations of favouring the wealthy, thereby allowing the usual envy peddlers to spew their predictable bile. This shift made some sense given the stagnancy of the British economy: in a time of economic doldrums, it was more politically expedient to show that all labour equally under the idiotic cosh of stifling governmental policy. It is the same truth with most leftist ideas, as they fall short of their intentions and only ensure equal misery.
So, yes, Kwarteng’s budget is a good one. However, I fear it is not enough. Resurrecting the ghost of Thatcher and Lawson will not suffice in the upcoming battle. Whereas we were once a country unified in spirit but divided in details of economic policy, we have become one largely apathetic towards economics and split increasingly in spirit.
Questions of the soul – which the Conservatives shy away from, having embraced social liberalism in its entirety – weigh heavily on the body politick. The great many modern lies, now too copious to innumerate, but which rear their head on a daily basis, have to be tackled.
Man is not merely an economic beast. The Conservatives have failed to recognise the interconnectedness of our economic, social, cultural and political lives, hoping that if they could stuff bungs of cash into the right people’s mouths then all would be well, or that the young would simply grow out of their leftward bent.
Such thinking is misguided. Generational changes do occur. Just look at church attendance over the 20th century. There were surely some optimistic Christians who, seeing the irreligiousness of their children’s generation, thought they would creep back to the pews after their youthful rebellion. Given the mean age of most Church of England congregations is approximately 97 and a half, such optimism was apparently misplaced.
As such, the Conservatives, who have only just reoccupied once long-held territory, must advance into new lands. In venturing forth into this uncomfortable territory, the shrieking of the usual sorts will reach new, eardrum-rupturing highs. Yet, it is the only way to ensure the party, and the nation’s, survival.
It will mean pointing to an array of hideously naked emperors and screaming out the blindingly obvious, and it will straddle many spheres. It will require bold moves that favour the mass of ordinary people who now suffer amid the institutional capture of the left.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion mandates must be tackled, and the citizen’s freedom of speech enshrined. Laws must be implemented that elevate those key components of Western civilisation’s success: the right to express one’s opinions and the security of conscience.
The anti-family, anti-social policies pursued and peddled by ideologues must be countered. That the nuclear family is the building block of any free society – and hence the first target of any communistic venture – must be backed up by words and deeds.
Advanced rot in the wooden structure of our education system must be torn out and replaced with solid oak. The mistruths and distortions which seek to paint our nation as history’s criminals have to be done away with, with a proper grounding of our country’s unique history and constitution foremost.
Immigration – the greatest of the many elephants in the room – will have to be dealt with in short order. The waves of illegal immigrants crossing the Channel, together with continued levels of inward immigration beyond sustainable levels, need to be dealt with. The cost in doing so will be to have those who would never vote Conservative in the first place kick up a stink, but it would all but guarantee the trust of swathes of Middle England.
Heaven knows there is more. Decades of weak leadership have left much work to be done. Until now, politicians have either been too cowardly, fearing their careers, or complicit in the spread of these modern, mendacious mistruths and misgovernment.
Yet, what is at stake is nothing more than the nation’s very survival. Johnson already squandered an unparalleled opportunity. There won’t be many more chances to get it right.
You forgot to mention who is going to lead us into this brave new world! The quality of politicians of any party in any country is well below the level needed to make any difference at all. I can see no capable, competent and courageous politician striding confidently forward to take control and fight off the dragons. The church of England is full of chinless namby pambys staring at their navels. The political parties are full of venal self-serving narcissists. The mega corporations aren't going to help (although my husband thinks Jamie Dimon might be an interesting choice for US president!) and the lobbyists are just working to their own narrow agenda. So where do we look?
A free market economy is one thing. But looking at the context of the current budget, my take is that Truss (because let’s face it, this is her budget) is actively seeking to achieve something very different- high inflation & high interest rates. (Since this is the virtually inevitable consequence of her economic policy in our current context, I think we should give her the credit of assuming it is intended.)
This would be a great policy for capital asset holders, and a disaster for the middle classes. In fact, it’s a vast transfer of assets from the middle classes to monopolistic crony capitalists.
This looks to me like cynical exploitation & corruption. Which isn’t the same as a free market by any means.